Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn YouTube
    Trending
    • Why is it Safer to Use a Prebuilt Platform for your Website?
    • Overcoming Barriers to the Metaverse Requires Ubiquitous Connectivity
    • 10 Strategies to Stop Ransomware Attacks
    • Rajiv Kulkarni Talks about the Malware Analysis Pipeline
    • IDS Alliance Raises Awareness of IAM Fundamentals with the ‘CISO Chronicles’
    • Building Digital Accessibility: AI Requires Human Oversight to Cut Down on Algorithmic Biases
    • BlackBerry Ivy: Enabling a New Age of Electric Secure Autonomous Vehicles
    • Security Automation Cuts Down Expenses and Saves Time for IT Teams
    TechSpective
    • RSS
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google+
    • LinkedIn
    • Instagram
    • Pinterest
    • Technology
      Featured
      March 1, 20216

      Could Home Study Be Better for Education? Using Technology to Craft a Better Tomorrow

      Recent
      May 27, 2022

      Overcoming Barriers to the Metaverse Requires Ubiquitous Connectivity

      May 20, 2022

      Building Digital Accessibility: AI Requires Human Oversight to Cut Down on Algorithmic Biases

      May 20, 2022

      BlackBerry Ivy: Enabling a New Age of Electric Secure Autonomous Vehicles

    • Reviews
      Featured
      March 4, 20211

      Dell’s UltraSharp 40 – Improving Work and Workplaces with Monitor Innovations

      Recent
      April 7, 2022

      Dell’s Latitude 5430 Rugged – Redefining the Extremes of Mobile Computing

      October 12, 2021

      Innovating Home Video Conferencing: Dell’s New 27 Video Conferencing Monitor – S2722DZ

      September 22, 2021

      Review: Intrusion Shield

    • Podcasts
    • Security
      Featured
      March 7, 20212

      Pandemic Unmasks Vulnerability to Automated Bot Attacks

      Recent
      May 26, 2022

      10 Strategies to Stop Ransomware Attacks

      May 25, 2022

      Rajiv Kulkarni Talks about the Malware Analysis Pipeline

      May 23, 2022

      IDS Alliance Raises Awareness of IAM Fundamentals with the ‘CISO Chronicles’

    • Microsoft
      Featured
      September 12, 20201

      The Microsoft Surface Duo: The Communications Device for Those That Think Different

      Recent
      April 8, 2022

      AI and Why Windows 12 Could Be a Far Bigger Advance than Windows 95 Was

      October 11, 2021

      The Surface Laptop Studio: Building a Windows 11 Targeted Laptop

      August 28, 2021

      Why Microsoft’s Hardware Baseline for Windows 11 Is Important

    • News & Analysis
      Featured
      March 6, 20212

      Fixing The World One Person At A Time: Cisco Networking Academy

      Recent
      May 25, 2022

      Rajiv Kulkarni Talks about the Malware Analysis Pipeline

      May 20, 2022

      BlackBerry Ivy: Enabling a New Age of Electric Secure Autonomous Vehicles

      May 20, 2022

      IBM Think 2022 – Embracing the Present, Preparing for the Future

    • Business
      Featured
      March 6, 20212

      Fixing The World One Person At A Time: Cisco Networking Academy

      Recent
      May 27, 2022

      Why is it Safer to Use a Prebuilt Platform for your Website?

      May 20, 2022

      Building Digital Accessibility: AI Requires Human Oversight to Cut Down on Algorithmic Biases

      May 20, 2022

      Security Automation Cuts Down Expenses and Saves Time for IT Teams

    TechSpective
    You are at:Home»News & Analysis»AMD»AMD Rising: Fixing the Long-Term Problem
    AMD Intel common socket x86 CPU
    Image from Pixabay

    AMD Rising: Fixing the Long-Term Problem

    0
    By Rob Enderle on November 22, 2019 AMD, Intel, Processors, Strategy, x86

    I’ve been meeting with several PC OEMs of late and there is a near constant cadence of producing more and more systems with AMD as the core technology provider. This is both because Intel has been having security and production problems, and because AMD has been executing at a cadence that has their CEO, Lisa Su, ranked as one of the best in the world.

    But, behind the scenes—in what is expected to be a strong quarter—the OEMs are still going to be short product because they can’t easily swap Intel processors for those created by AMD. AMD has also had issues in the past and you’d think the OEMs would demand both vendors come together on a common socket so that when this problem happens it just reflects on the supplier having the problem not the entire industry.

    Let’s talk about that this week.

    The Common Socket Problem

    AMD and Intel both exist because IBM, when they created the PC in the first place, wanted redundancy in their vendors so that if one had a problem they could easily switch to the other and wouldn’t take a revenue hit at a critical time. Particularly in the consumer market, buying cycles are highly seasonal and if you miss either back to school or holiday buying seasons, your entire year sales could fall well below expectations. CEOs are typically not particularly forgiving when this happens, because boards and investors aren’t forgiving either, so avoiding that outcome became a priority when selecting X86—and architecture championed by Intel—as the platform for their effort.

    So, Intel licensed the architecture to AMD, creating a second source for the processors and enabling Intel to become the predominant PC microprocessor vendor. Meanwhile, AMD got a revenue stream that enabled them to grow and prosper as well.

    But then AMD wanted more than just to be the redundant vendor and to compete to lead the market. This led to a conflict that was resolved by Intel paying AMD a large settlement and AMD, in exchange, giving up access to Intel’s socket and chipset technology. In thinking back the government should have flagged this as anti-competitive and AMD should have never made this move because it locked Intel in and made it almost impossible for AMD to move out of niche status. It should likely go down in history as one of the biggest mistakes both vendors made.

    Intel’s Big Mistake

    You’ll note I said both vendors. It is clear that it removed opportunity from AMD but why was it also bad for Intel? Well, because it led to the problems Intel has been having for much of this decade. The reason is it allowed Intel to lock in the PC vendors and lock-in generally leads to a supplier taking customers for granted and shifting support from the locked-in segment to other initiatives. This is what was happening when the PC market nearly collapsed. Intel’s executive leadership decided it didn’t really need to push any harder, AMD was having problems anyway, and the PC vendors were stuck, so Intel cut demand generation efforts sharply. As a result, rather than facing AMD competition Intel instead faced a bigger problem of a general market decline. Under their last CEO, Brian Krzanich, they all but abandoned both PCs and servers, and while Bob Swan is doing an impressive job turning Intel around the firm wouldn’t be in the place it is in had it not taken its eye off the ball and executed a failed attempt to displace Qualcomm.

    GPUs

    Now if you look at the GPU segment—I’m talking about graphics cards—you don’t see these kinds of issues and that is because AMD and NVIDIA are socket compatible (on desktop computers). If one makes a mistake or has a problem, the market can and does shift to the other. You’ll note that neither of these vendors have taken their customers or their market for granted even as NVIDIA impressively pivoted to AI and self-driving cars.

    They compete heavily, remain focused on building the markets that are paying the bills, and the OEMs aren’t talking about them like they used to complain about Intel.

    Wrapping Up: We Need the Common Socket Back

    It isn’t just the end customers and OEMs that need the common socket back, but Intel and AMD as well. Competition is critical for any market because invariably when you remove it the new dominant vendor abuses their near absolute power and gets into trouble. IBM did this with mainframes in the 80s, Microsoft did this with browsers in the 90s, and Intel is in trouble now. By promoting competition, rather than eliminating it, much like a successful athlete needs to find challenging opponents to remain competitive, vendors better assure their futures and are more successful in preserving their markets.

    I should add it is also a ton more fun to work in a competitive market because firms will spend to compete and that means raises and incentives because it is more critical to get and retain good people. Put bluntly: competition good, lock-in bad…for everyone.

    One final proof point, Microsoft also focused on lock-in broadly with browsers but was forced to interoperate by the EU. As a result, they aren’t only far more successful—the company is a far more interesting place to work today. Just saying.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBalancing Cybersecurity and Digital Transformation
    Next Article Adam & Danielle from ‘Marriage and Martinis’ Chat about Starting a Podcast
    Rob Enderle
    • Website

    As President and Principal Analyst of the Enderle Group, Rob provides regional and global companies with guidance in how to create credible dialogue with the market, target customer needs, create new business opportunities, anticipate technology changes, select vendors and products, and practice zero dollar marketing. For over 20 years Rob has worked for and with companies like Microsoft, HP, IBM, Dell, Toshiba, Gateway, Sony, USAA, Texas Instruments, AMD, Intel, Credit Suisse First Boston, ROLM, and Siemens.

    Related Posts

    Why is it Safer to Use a Prebuilt Platform for your Website?

    Building Digital Accessibility: AI Requires Human Oversight to Cut Down on Algorithmic Biases

    Software-based Enterprise Solutions for Navigating the “Too Much Information” Age

    Comments are closed.

    Site Sponsors
    Intel
    DevOps.com
    Adobe
    PopSpective
    • Technology
    • Popular
    • Top Reviews
    May 27, 2022

    Overcoming Barriers to the Metaverse Requires Ubiquitous Connectivity

    May 20, 2022

    Building Digital Accessibility: AI Requires Human Oversight to Cut Down on Algorithmic Biases

    May 20, 2022

    BlackBerry Ivy: Enabling a New Age of Electric Secure Autonomous Vehicles

    9.0
    July 14, 2016

    Review: Lenovo Yoga 900S

    9.5
    March 2, 2015

    Review: Asus Zenbook UX305 ultrabook

    8.0
    February 9, 2015

    Review: Burg 12 smartwatch

    9.7
    November 16, 2018

    Review: BlackVue DR900S-2CH Vehicle Dash Cam

    9.5
    September 2, 2015

    Review: Microsoft Band

    May 27, 2014

    Protect your family photos with ScanMyPhotos

    Coffee and Politics
    Popular Posts
    9.0
    July 14, 2016

    Review: Lenovo Yoga 900S

    9.5
    March 2, 2015

    Review: Asus Zenbook UX305 ultrabook

    8.0
    February 9, 2015

    Review: Burg 12 smartwatch

    Coffee and Politics
    Adobe
    Adobe
    • RSS
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Google+
    • LinkedIn
    • Instagram
    • Pinterest
    About

    TechSpective covers technology trends and breaking news in a meaningful way that brings value to the story, and provides you with information that is relevant to you. We offer in-depth reporting and long-form feature stories, as well as breaking news coverage, product reviews, and community content in plain English terms, and with a unique perspective on technology.

    Coffee and Politics

    © 2020 Xpective, Inc.

    • About
    • Privacy
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Contact
    © 2021 Xpective, Inc.
    • About
    • Privacy
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Contact

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.