I had a ball at the Mercedes Advanced Driving Academy this week but, as I thought about it, they took a ton of avoidable risks that likely contributed to the one accident we had and the loss of a $70K engine. It continues to fascinate me how the car companies—that are on the edge of being displaced by computer companies and self-driving cars–don’t seem to understand the technology available to them to not only improve their cars, but improve their customer relationships and loyalty, and—in this case—their affinity programs. This doesn’t mean I wouldn’t recommend the course as is—it is actually a great value and I had a ball. I also expect that the AMG Advanced Driving Academy isn’t alone with the problems I observed but this should serve as a heads up that there are better ways to do this before someone gets killed or crippled.
The AMG Advanced Driving course is a two-day event on weekends done all over the world. I took it at the storied Laguna Seca race course near Monterey, California. It is a beautiful technical course which is actually pretty forgiving and gives a nice mix of high speed straights, mixed corners, and unusually challenging pit lane exits (which they likely should fix).
You are first put into randomly selected teams, which, I expect is more to make the gymkhana competition fair but often creates a wide skill gap in the groups which increases the danger for both the experienced and inexperienced drivers. Someone must have forgotten that we don’t take classes like this for the trophies but to learn and advance, and by not putting us into skill level grouping the training wasn’t optimized.
We are then taken through a series of exercises over two days. These consist of slalom training, gymkhana training, drift training, and finally race training on the main track. It is comprehensive, but there is no sense of any quality measurement which focuses on how much improvement either the students make during the course (everyone passes unless they get kicked out) or improvement for the course itself. Thus segments that didn’t work well, like the gymkhana and drift training segments, wouldn’t be improved over time and they needed work.
One obvious improvement to put the instructors in the cars with the students from time to time so they could actually see what the student is doing wrong. I’ve had race coaching in the past and this was the only time the instructor never rode with the student when they were driving. Granted, that can be scary but, often this is the only way to tell if the student is actually doing things right. In one of the segments—the drift segment—it would have helped a great deal particularly if the car, like some drivers training cars, had twin controls. Drifting is a feel thing, and the more help you can get to achieve the necessary “feel” the more you’d progress.
There were a number of key areas where technology could have vastly improved the experience. First the use of simulators where students can practice on their own and work on things that they either aren’t getting or just want to improve. Even professional drivers use simulators now because you can put hundreds of hours in on them for a tiny fraction of what a car would cost to run on the track.
- Central telematics. This is used on race cars so the pit boss and crew can monitor how the car and driver are doing. Often the instructor is out on the track leading the drivers he or she is training and not in a position to observe every individual student. But an operator centrally located could monitor the telematics on the car and both identify if there is a problem with the car before someone got hurt and provide feedback on recurring errors or immediately identify unsafe practices (like slowing down on a lead/follow lap due to fear or because the driver wants to drive excessively fast to catch up).
- Hands-free communications. This was perhaps the biggest red flag I saw. The instructors were having to juggle several two-way radios while also driving their cars at speed; often with a passenger in the car asking questions. This means they were not only driving highly distracted but with one hand and not using the required 10-2 hand positioning on the wheel but they weren’t watching where they were going all the time. One was actually driving with his palm in the middle of the wheel. A sudden flat, a tire going off the track, or any kind of unplanned obstacle could not only have led to the injury or death of the instructor but to that of one or more students. It is ill-advised for street drivers to drive distracted and with one hand while operating phones or any other personal device, for a race car driver to do this is inexcusable. And yet I observed this to be universal not because the drivers were bad drivers, but because they didn’t have a choice. That’s unacceptable.
Finally, there was no effort to profile the drivers in order to identify those that were over their head, or that might freeze up at a critical moment. The only qualifying question seemed to be if you’d ever taken a course before or driven on a race track. At Hooked On Driving events I’ve seen people argue they have advanced race experience even though the only track they’ve ever raced on was on an X Box. I saw several students that shouldn’t have been on a race track as they were accidents waiting to happen. Accident prevention shouldn’t be about assigning blame it should be about preventing the accident in the first place.
Wrapping Up: Why It Is Critical to Have Program Reviews
Now, I did have a great time and—for an experienced track day driver–I’d recommend this class. But, it could be made both more effective and far safer. I expect it has been pretty static for a long time. What makes the program work are some great instructors, but with the right application of technology, focused quality metrics, and regular reviews (probably by folks more experienced than I am) it could be made better, and more importantly, far safer than it is.
It really doesn’t matter how good your people are, if you don’t have regular independent reviews or strong quality focused metrics they won’t improve and safety problems—like the overly distracted instructors–won’t be flagged until after someone dies and then not only will lives be lost, but a few careers will be lost as well. If you want to avoid that outcome, assure that your programs have regular independent reviews, you have a process to improve quality, and that the program’s goals remain aligned with the company’s.
5 thoughts on “The Mercedes AMG Advanced Driving Academy: A Dangerously Low-Tech Approach to Race Training”
That a dangerous driving school. Because for inexperienced users it can cause great accidents.
Just returned from the BMW Performance Driving School in Thermal, CA where I did the Car Control Clinic. This is a 1 day course – offered for free to anyone who bought a new 2017 BMW.
There the instructors park at opposite ends of a small (but windy) track – you are observed very closely indeed and given tips and told to take the short pit lane should anyone catch up with you. Safety was markedly superior and you should try this. The cars were 340i and M240i’s which were plenty fast.
The BMW school had a very good record when I asked – a couple of instances at the larger track in the 2 years without injuries if I recall – there was little to hit if you span off the track.
There is also an M class for those who purchased M2, M3, M4… cars. They have a larger track (not Laguna Seca) at the adjacent Thermal Club used for that class. Participants get to drive M3s.
I am attending the BASIC AMG Driving Academy at the end of September in Laguna Seca. I can see how on a big track the instructors have more limited ability to supervise each driver. However I would ask to know the safety record before jumping to conclusions.
I’d also say a car simulator is no substitute for the real thing.
But simulators are good for teaching the proper line to take through a turn and instructors can focus better on the drivers for the basics and then do a better job of putting people in groups. Agree a course with all simulators wouldn’t be great but a mix allows for better focused instruction and you can’t crash a simulator. There three big problems with the AMG course I took. The instructors couldn’t really focus on the students, the student groups weren’t selected by skill set, and the classes weren’t focused on progress just completion.
You’ll love the track, my hope is they at least took away the three hand held radios the instructors were using so they can focus better on the students and their own driving. That was stupid dangerous. Just saw the new BMW sports car prototype, I’m really, really tempted… http://www.businessinsider.com/bmw-z4-concept-sports-car-pebble-beach-2017-8
The AMG Driving Academy is basically just a marketing pitch. It’s not technical at all and I felt like it was really cheesy, especially with the videos and presentation in the morning. You had to watch AMG commercials. Take the class to get away from work for a minute or two but don’t think for a second that it will help you advance in racing. If you want to learn how to drive, Skip Barber Racing School is way more helpful and intense. I was disappointed in how slow we drove the AMG GT Rs when I had been in Dodge Neons flying around the same track at twice the speed at Skip Barber. Since I already owned an AMG and knew how much more I could push my own car, I left the track kind of like, welp, I’ll never do that again.
Hmmm… The little credibility you had disappeared with the 10 and 2 hand position comment. If you’re an experienced track day driver, you should know that 9 and 3 is the actual position.
Hooked on driving has a good program and they won’t let you in the D group just because you say you’re experienced. Sure, some people make wild claims but HOD is very serious about safety. Apparently more so than the AMG school.
Comments are closed.